Is Cheating In Video Games Fun

What other tips are important to consider for new PC gamers? 10 Video Game Tips Every PC Gamer Should Know! Subscribe now to TheGamer! When it comes to video games, the concept of cheating can become blurry and misleading. Surprising as it is, cheating in games is sometimes acceptable. It can make games more fun, and sometimes the developers put in cheat codes, hacks, or bots for the players’ entertainment. Other times cheating can make it unfair for other players. Cheating in video games involves a video game player using various methods to create an advantage beyond normal gameplay, in order to make the game easier.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cheating in video games article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
  • Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
  • Sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
  • New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
  • Be polite and avoid personal attacks
  • Seek dispute resolution if needed
Find sources:Google (books·news·newspapers·scholar·free images·WP refs) ·FENS·JSTOR·NYT·TWL
WikiProject Video games(Rated C-class, High-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article was a past project collaboration.
FYI
AfDs
  • Standard Galactic Alphabet (2 participants)
  • Magical Chaser ~Stardust of Dreams~ (2 participants)
  • Razerpak (3 participants)
  • Heads Up (video game) (7 participants)
  • Henry Stickmin (4 participants)
  • GSN Video Games (4 participants)
  • Doughlings: Invasion (2 participants)
  • Doughlings: Arcade (1 participant)
  • Zatikon (2 participants)
  • Chronic Logic (2 participants)
  • Mayhem Brawler (2 participants)
  • Profezia (1 participant)
  • Gods Unchained (3 participants)
  • Amiga Games Database (6 participants)
  • Fntastic (4 participants)
  • Nitrome (4 participants)
  • DartMUD (4 participants)
  • Dragon City (11 participants)
  • Dream (YouTuber) (27 participants; relisted)
  • Dragon Mania Legends (2 participants; relisted)
  • Amadeus Revenge (5 participants; relisted)
  • Altar Games (4 participants; relisted)
  • Gary Schwartz (actor) (10 participants; relisted)
  • Paper Mario: The Origami King (nom)
  • Islanders (video game) (nom)
  • Namco (nom)
  • Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere (start)
  • Need for Speed: ProStreet (start)
  • Kirby Star Allies (nom)
  • Genshin Impact (nom)
  • Trauma Center: Second Opinion (start)
  • The Hobbit (2003 video game) (start)
  • Trauma Center: Under the Knife 2 (start)
  • Legend Entertainment (start)
  • Accolade (company) (nom)
  • Doctor Neo Cortex (start)
  • Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash (start)
  • Five Nights at Freddy's (video game) (nom)
  • Wii (nom)
  • Space Gun (nom)
  • Daytona USA (rev)
  • Accolade (company) (rev)
  • Super Mario Bros. 35 (rev)
  • League of Legends (rev)
  • Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Wrath of the Darkhul King (rev)
Articles that need..
  • assessment (74) (73)
  • cleanup (16)
  • cover art (2,092)
  • infoboxes (201)
  • infobox params removed (0)
  • reassessment (5)
  • screenshots (7,546)
  • photos (58)
  • translation from jawp (139)
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
  • Maiberg, Emanuel (30 April 2014). 'Hacks! An investigation into aimbot dealers, wallhack users, and the million-dollar business of video game cheating'. PC Gamer. Future plc.
  • http://scroll.vg/issues/06

Collaboration[edit]

Hi there, I've been trying to help improve this article and am compiling a list of useful articles for research. San andreas cheat codes ps2. Some of these are just ones suggested on the discussion about this article on the collaboration page. Feel free to add any more you think will be useful!

I will shortly explain, how to reset your game timer to achieve Excalibur II. You will need Cheat Engine (I am using Cheat Engine 6.4). YOU HAVE TO BE VERY FAST TO MEMORIZE YOUR TIME AND PAUSE FAST ENOUGH 1. Select FF9 in Process List in Cheat Engine and load it into Cheat Engine 2. Look at your time in the menu (should be e.g. If i pause the game and i change the value in cheat engine then the timer changes in the game but when i unpause the game the old timer comes back and the new value that i put is ignored. If i freeze the value in cheat engine then there are two timers in the game on top of each other: one timer is the frozen value and the other one is counting down. SUBSCRIBE: Cheat Engine Tutorial Series: Twitch: this video, I show you how to quickly. Cheat engine how to caculate game timer.

-Sturm55 23:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

From early cheating history:

  • Jet Set Willy has already been referenced by Oscarthecat; will need to find citations but I believe it was one of the most hacked 8-bit games (mainly due to the fact that it could only be completed by cheating.)
  • Magazines like Your Sinclair had pages devoted to cheating ('The Tipshop') and the covertapes included programs that were bundles of cheat codes (YS's was compiled by Phil South).
  • Amiga Power also had cheat pages but in its later days it scorned upon cheating (as being ungentlemanly or something) and the cheat-page hosts were mocked.

-Marasmusine 07:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Is Cheating In Video Games Fun To Play

Thanks, those will be alot of help with expanding the history of cheating section.-Sturm55 21:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

It would be neat if some of the following sections were included:

  • Reasons for cheating in single player and multiplayer games. (I tried doing this but I ran out of ideas)

-some reasons for cheating are mentioned in the prevalence of cheating section, but those only apply to single-player games. You might want to add to that with some reasons for cheating in online games. This article might give you some ideas. - Sturm55 09:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Common hacks used in online games (Counter-Strike, Runescape, etc.)
  • Fix stuff I add :)

-Dr.scradley

Legality of Cheating[edit]

I think the Legality of Cheating section should contain some information about the EULA. I think the deal is, game companies cannot arrest you for cheating, they can only deny you their service if you violate the EULA, right? I don't dare contributing, because I don't know that much about the subject. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MisterPhyrePhox (talk • contribs) 16:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC).

Hot Coffee[edit]

Hot Coffee wasn't a cheat. It was only accessible through a modification of the game. -Not Diablo 03:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I've removed that reference, and added a link to Mod (computer gaming) under See also. Marasmusine 07:53, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Reliable sources[edit]

I'm hoping to get some references in for some specific types of cheat (big-head mode, for example.) Now, whilst there are hundreds of game cheating sites with user-submitted cheats, is there a site with some editorial control over such submissions (that could therefore be used as a reliable source?) It's either that or dig out some old gaming magazines.Marasmusine 07:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

'Manual cheating'[edit]

Is there anything on the concept of 'putting a weight on the controller/keyboard' to keep a button pressed down? This might not qualify as cheating but it seems relevent 76.66.125.118 07:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Macros in World of Warcraft[edit]

The use of macros is not forbidden in World of Warcraft.. they even put an interface in the game where you can create them.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.232.51 (talk) 04:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Abuse of bugs[edit]

Should this article contain a section on bug abuse and why or why not that would be considered cheating? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.5.103.158 (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)


Cheapness[edit]

There should be a section on being 'cheap' too. For example, abusing techniques not intended for the game, such as in Street Fighter II how you can throw the opponent without giving them recovery time after hitting them with a quick jab. --Denise from the Cosby Show (talk) 07:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Wing and a Prayer (25 points): Collect both of Astrodactyl's Upgrade Tokens in Single Player. Ben 10 omniverse xbox 360 game cheat codes. Speedy Recovery (25 points): Collect both of XLR8's Upgrade Tokens in Single Player. Tastes Like Chicken (25 points): Collect both of Bullfrag's Upgrade Tokens in Single Player. I'm Cool Like That (25 points): Collect both of Big Chill's Upgrade Tokens in Single Player. Block Party (25 points): Collect both of Bloxx's Upgrade Tokens in Single Player.

Using 'Cheats' vs. 'Cheating'[edit]

As a couple of the comments above suggest, there's a difference between using a feature designed into a program that intentionally overrides the 'normal' play, and a feature that was not designed, but a bug or a weakness in the design. This probably needs to be two articles.

There are several differences between the two. The feature set of 'cheats' can be documented in Wikipedia: they have reliable sources: either the original game designers, or later programmers. 'Cheating' as a whole, exploiting weaknesses in design is a philosophical issue: Is it really cheating to have a character do XYZ a thousand times to raise their stats?

There's a lot of original research in the article, but whether it is 'going too far' depends on what's being talked about.

'Cheating in video games has existed for almost their entire history. The first cheat codes were put in place for play testing purposes.'

Well, design defects that can be exploited are just bugs. And bugs always exist in software. So the first sentence is wrong as applied to 'cheating'. The second sentence, which only applies to 'cheats', is wrong in different ways. There's a lot of folklore about how 'cheats' started, but much is just unreferenced rumor. There's no proof what the 'first cheat codes' were, and if there were, I don't know of any reliable encyclopedic information about their 'purpose'. The Wiki editor assumes the 'cheats' were for 'testing purposes', but that's pure speculation. The first 'cheat codes' might just have been for fun, or as placeholders for unfinished features. 'Backdoors' were standard practice for programmers long before the first games.

The reasons 'cheats' and 'cheating' exist are largely different. The way they are 'discovered' are largely different. A company's response to a 'cheat' is entirely different than to an unintentional weakness that allows 'cheating'.

This article needs to be two articles. Both need sound references. Piano non troppo (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you've removed references to publications like Your Sinclair, Gamespot, etc on the grounds of them being 'blogs', so I've reverted one step. Can you go into more detail about your objection to each? Marasmusine (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Because they are amateur homespun websites on the level of poor blogs without citations, references, or authors [1][2]. A major purpose of an external link is to add material that doesn't fit in the Wiki article, but would be generally suitable for a Featured Article. (WP:ELNO 'Links normally to be avoided', points 1 and 11.) Furthermore the information is trivial and appears, since they both include pricing to also be promotional. Not even remotely close to acceptable. Piano non troppo (talk) 11:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Video Games Online

You're jesting are you not with regard to the promotional claim? The articles are verbatim transcripts of magazines printed in October 1984, and February 1989 respectively. A seconds investigation would have revealed that. At no stretch of the imagination does that count as promotional. Furthermore, the both articles are definite examples of the references - a description of how to get the desired result, and an attempt to sell the results.
Forewarned - I shall be reverting as I disagree with your assesment of both '..on the level of poor blogs..' and WP:ELNO 'Links normally to be avoided' - which does not mean they must be avoided. a_man_alone (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Firstly, regarding WP:ELNO: 'The subject of this guideline is external links that are not citations to sources supporting article content.' These are references you are removing, not mere external links. Secondly, I've said before, these are not a blogs, or even websites; they are published print magazines. For example, Your Spectrum was published by Dennis Publishing in the UK between 1983 and 1986. If you object to the url to the online archive, fine, you can remove the url, but please don't remove the whole 'cite journal'. These fully satisfy the criteria for reliable sources. Finally, whilst it may not be common practice now, during the 80s videogame magazines often included the retail price of the item being reviewed. Marasmusine (talk) 12:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
The phrase 'However, a cheat industry emerged as gaming systems evolved, through the packaging and selling of cheating as a product.' needs a reference? Would any reader doubt this happened? Hardly. You've provided a reference that's unnecessary, except to waste some baffled reader's time. Think 'encyclopedia' and not 'fancruft'. Documenting fancruft is still fancruft. Piano non troppo (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
What exactly do you have an issue with - the content, or the references? At first it seemed that you were taking issue with the references, and so removing them, however now you seem to have a problem with the content, not the references that backed up the content. I mean, sure, you could be against both, but I'd just like to clarify which it is so I can respond appropriately. I fail to see how a statement - backed up with an example - of people profiting financially from cheating is fancruft. In the same context, I cannot see how an example of what a cheat actually does to the code is fancruft. If you see any baffled readers, that's probably because somebody has taken references out which explain or give examples. a_man_alone (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Level select/skip level[edit]

Another common 'cheat' not mentioned is level select, and also skip level; I know many 16 bit and some 8 bit games with these features. Sonic 1 & 2 for the Mega Drive had a level select screen among other cheats, as did Earth Worm Jim (which called you a cheater when you accessed it). Aladin, Chuck Rock and Lion King among others had a cheat feature where it would skip to the next level if the player pressed the correct sequence of buttons, often whilst paused. Hidden warp zones like that in Super Mario Bros on the NES, where the player can find a hidden area and warp to a later level sometimes with several level warps to choose from. I imagine many would say these are not cheating as they are within the game, but I think they could be mentioned anyway as they are hidden and make the game a lot easier similar to cheats, and are a bit crafty, some might know about them but disapprove of using them just like cheats.

I am sure there are many more games than I can think of with these features, not sure where to put it in the article but I think we should mention it. do users agree? Carlwev (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

If we can get a source discussing this as a kind of cheat, it can go somewhere in this article. Marasmusine (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Wizard mode[edit]

Is Cheating In Video Games Fun To Play On Computer

Some history: Two of the earliest computer games (Colossal Cave and Rogue) had wizard modes that gave users extra powers. Can this be added to the article?

Flash cheats games. Cheats and tips for games for many platforms including PC, Playstation 2, PSOne, GameCube, Xbox, Xbox360 and more. The best and largest selection of PC game cheats, PC game codes, PC game cheat codes, PC cheatcodes, PC passwords, PC hints, PC tips, PC tricks, PC strategy guides, PC FAQs, codes for PC, pc codes, pc cheats, pc cheat codes, pc cheatcodes, pc passwords, pc hints, pc tips, pc tricks, pc strategy guides, pc faqs, pc video game cheat codes. The Company features several cheats. Cheat codes are available for everybody, you do not need to be a Patreon supporter to be able to access them. You can input them by starting the game as a rerun (select 'I have played the game before' in the opening screen) and then entering cheatcodes into the bar at the botton. CHANELNUMBER5 - Start the game with John already turned into Chanel.

Topher67 (talk) 05:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

https://viewernin.netlify.app/the-thing-game-cheats.html. Game Shark Codes. Master Code (Must Be On) 0E3C7DF2 1853E59E EE8C6406 BCBCD3EA; Infinite Health: DEBD6E92 F8AADD4B DEBD6E9A 6AAA9B1F; Infinite Ammo: DE4E515A E0AC9BB5; Around The Web. More Cheats & Codes. SHARE THIS PAGE. Best New Stuff on CheatCC. Why the Switch is the PERFECT Second Console! Is the Oculus on a. This page contains a list of cheats, codes, Easter eggs, tips, and other secrets for The Thing for Xbox.If you've discovered a cheat you'd like to add to the page, or have a correction, please. The Thing Cheats Xbox Submitted by James Barrett Get Witley on your team To get Witley on your team when you reach the dome at the very start where you see Witley before you take a step throw a. Get the latest The Thing cheats, codes, unlockables, hints, Easter eggs, glitches, tips, tricks, hacks, downloads, hints, guides, FAQs, walkthroughs, and more for PlayStation 2 (PS2). CheatCodes.com has all you need to win every game you play! Use the above links or scroll down see all to the PlayStation 2 cheats we have available for The Thing. Wait about one minute at the main menu to view a longer, uncut television trailer for the game. Enable game saves. Note: This procedure involves editing a registry value; do not attempt this if you are not familiar with working with your system registry, as a mistake can cause serious problems with Windows. Start Regedit and use the 'Registry/Export Registry File' menu option.

Is Cheating In Video Games Fun Facts

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cheating in video games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080928211724/http://uk.cheats.ign.com/ob2/068/001/001991.html to http://uk.cheats.ign.com/ob2/068/001/001991.html
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713004924/http://uk.faqs.ign.com/mail/2006-09-01.html to http://uk.faqs.ign.com/mail/2006-09-01.html
  • Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070106063512/http://www.devmaster.net/articles/mmorpg-postmortem/part2.php to http://www.devmaster.net/articles/mmorpg-postmortem/part2.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 23:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Fun
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheating_in_video_games&oldid=902013350'